Assessing The Issue Of Child Protection Social Work Essay Essay Example

Assessing The Issue Of Child Protection Social Work Essay Essay Example Assessing The Issue Of Child Protection Social Work Essay Essay Assessing The Issue Of Child Protection Social Work Essay Essay ( Ferriter, 2005, p.369 ) . It could take the Church some clip to mend the trust it abused. However it might be prudent to observe that the huge bulk of Priests or Gardai were non involved in the sexual maltreatment dirt. It would besides be appropriate to indicate out that the Catholic Church does set about to work for the good of and with immature people, through church administrations like the Catholic Youth Council ( CYC, 2009 ) As kids we can accommodate to alter rather readily, we will turn to accept the absence of attention, albeit with fright. We will merely approximately survive in a helter-skelter environment, without a safe topographic point or predictability. But, we are kids and powerless, how do we lose the feelings of choler and loss, who can we turn to ( Brown, 1989 ) . Meeting the legislative and many of the protection and developmental demands of Ireland s kids s could be the duty of province organic structures or bureaus affiliated to a province organic structure. Such bureaus would run within a statutory remit and might include Government departments the likes of the Department of Education and Science ( DoE A ; S ) . The educational demands of all kids and immature people in the State are the duty of the section who plays a significant function in pull offing the system that maintains the constitutional right for kids to have a free instruction ( Article 42.4 ) . Another province section with kids s services as a big part of its portfolio is the Department of Health and Children. This section will intercede with the HSE besides a public sector service supplier, and societal workers to place and keep the safety of any kid deemed at hazard. This excessively is a kid s right, as stated in the Constitution of Ireland ( Article 42.5 ) , an illustration of when the HSE may execute its function in a kid protection capacity could be when for what of all time ground the kid can non be cared for by his/her parents. However societal workers instance tonss are heavy and as a effect some kids could be at hazard of continued injury. In 1999 the Department of Health and Children published the Children First Guidelines for the protection and public assistance of kids. The purpose of the guidelines was to ; facilitate professionals in placing kid maltreatment, to give the mechanism for describing suspected child maltreatment and to better services for kids and households ( McDonald, 2009 ) . This papers was to incarnate the rules of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child ( UN CRC ) . The Convention advocates that the rights of kids and their attention take topographic point at the top of any signatory provinces legislative docket refering kids. This may non yet be the instance in Ireland in relation to its primary legal model. The Constitution of Ireland could be used to turn over any opinion made under late adopted Acts of the Apostless of kid related statute law. Despite Ireland s confirmation of the EU Convention for Human Rights and the UN CRC these cosmopolitan rights may non be immune to dis pute mentioning the Constitution of Ireland. As was the instance in 1992 when article 40.3.3 of the Constitution, was used in an effort to deny a kid her right of transition through childhood because the antecedently mentioned article gave precedency to the unborn kid she was transporting. This became known as the X instance, the State tried to forestall a immature colza victim from ending the gestation ensuing from her maltreatment ( Fay, 2009 ) . There may still be cause for concern that action by the Irish Government could give rise to the state of affairs where a constitutional statement might overturn subsequent European jurisprudence adopted into Domestic statute law. It could be asked what existent protection recent reform offers a kid in crisis in Ireland. We might inquire how effectual is the Child Care Act 1991? Or can the demands of the kid be adequately catered for by a system that appears to lawfully bias for protection in a reactive sense, as opposed to recognizing the kid s demands and adequately passing for the proactive satisfaction of such demands. Besides, should a modern legal system be vulnerable to inquiry, because some constitutional articles from 1937 have non been suitably amended to convey them in line with society s modern demands? No job can be solved from the same consciousness that created it. We have to larn to see the universe anew ( Einstein in Sterling, 2001 ) The Child Care Act 1991 should nevertheless supply for the protection of kids in crisis. It bestows on An Garda Siochana the power to take a kid to a needful topographic point of safety if there are evidences to surmise the kid may endure injury. This action can be taken without the necessity for a warrant. These powers may be influential in instances where a kid is enduring maltreatment or if sufficient evidences exist to say the kid may be at hazard. A kid might be removed from the place or other topographic point where he/she could be harmed. Through the Criminal Law Act 1993 it is now possible to screen occupation applier s prosecution history prior to employment in the societal attention, kid attention, instruction and associated sectors. The vetting procedure takes considerable clip and is non without fallibility. However the Garda vetting procedure could discourage those with condemnable records from seeking to derive employment with societies vulnerable. The Gardai can beside s move to protect kids from being exploited for fiscal addition ; offenses in the class may include child employment or deriving financially from kids imploring. Under the Children Act 2001 any grownup with detention, charge or attention of a kid who is imploring, will confront prosecution. The Act besides provides for the physical and psychological well-being of the kid through specifying kid inhuman treatment, and leting that any maltreater will confront apprehension and prosecution. Families in Ireland with kids under the age of 18 receive kid benefit. The bureau charged with administrating child benefit and therefore could be assumed to hold some function in kid public assistance is, the Department of Social and Family Affairs. For households bing in a province of income inequality the payment can do a important difference in the criterion of life for all in the family. It could be a factor for many kids and immature people in maintaining them from being caught in the poorness trap. However proposed new authorities policy in the signifier of budgeted cuts in child benefit payments could lend in puting some of Irelands working hapless into a state of affairs where their kids may endure the effects of poorness. And for those households dependent on other signifiers of societal public assistance payments, possible amendments in the Social Welfare Act 2005 may ensue in them holding related payments reduced, once more intending dire effects for the public assistance of kids. Poverty in Ireland is found decreasingly among the retired or aged and progressively among the unemployed ( and accordingly households with kids ) . ( Tovey A ; Share, 2003, p.168 ) . Children in poorness may non acquire to eat a cooked repast every twenty-four hours ; they likely wo nt hold appropriate vesture or places for the season. It is likely that they will endure the indignity of exclusion losing out on the satisfaction an of import developmental demand, socialization. It may be due to their drama environment, deficiency of parental supervising or hapless diet impacting their physical well-being. A kid life in poorness harmonizing to Professor Aynsley-Green ( Children s Commissioner for England ) is 15 times more likely to endure inadvertent hurt than kids from a more flush background. In 1996 the Irish Government launched its National Anti-Poverty Strategy ( NAPS ) ( Tovey A ; Share, 2003 ) . Puting kids at hazard of life in poorness is non in maintaining with the values of the scheme. It might be argued that the proposed alterations to policy might conflict with the Children First Guidelines, stated in the drumhead papers one definition of kid maltreatment is neglect ; most of the measure uping standards mentioned in this description would besides depict significantly the symptoms of poorness. In respects of young person work nevertheless, the province seems to be making a batch right. Possibly because of immense input from those runing within the Youth Work sector, policy for the sector appears to be reasonably good accepted and efficient. Youth work comes under the wing of the Minister for Education ; this happens due in portion to the Youth work act 2001. The Act makes proviso for representation of voluntary organic structures in the Youth Advisory Council. It clearly defines the term Youth Work supplying a construction for the preparation of those employed in the sector. The Act lays out in item the functions of the regional Vocational Education Committees ( VECs ) refering young person work. The Minister for Education has duty for young person work programmes along with development and co-ordination at a national degree. With the VECs at a local degree playing a important function, in presenting young person services. This may intend that the VECs provide support and advisory aid to voluntary young person administrations, using young person officers while at the same clip keeping other youth work staff and drafting budgetary demands for bing and extra local young person work services on the land ( Share A ; Lalor, 2009 ) . In Ireland there are many long established voluntary young person administrations, some with and some without church association. Working in partnership with the CO. Dublin VEC is the Catholic Youth Care administration. This bureau supports a figure of young person nines and young person consultative Centres. It is besides active in advancing community youth based undertakings. The VEC is connected through support to Foroige, another young person nine administration who in partnership with the likes of the Local Drugs Task Force and the VEC offers a figure of youth information Centres and assorted types of young person development and instruction programmes. The above-mentioned administrations are members of the National Youth Council of Ireland. ( Share A ; Lalor, 2009, p.369 ) . As an umbrella group they play a lobbying function besides hosting a figure of support programmes such as the Child Protection Unit ( Share A ; Lalor, 2009 ) . The National Youth Council of Ireland ( NYCI ) impacts on immature people through the many voluntary young person administrations it represents. The NYCI purposes to authorise immature people to develop accomplishments and assurance the tools to go active citizens. The function of the NYCI is recognised in jurisprudence via the Youth Work Act 2001. The NYCI endorses the values enshrined in kid protection rules of the United Nations and domestic statute law such as the Children Act 2001. The steering rules of the administration are that the best involvements and authorization of immature people are overriding. To this terminal the NYCI may dispute alterations in policy that might conflict on immature individuals rights. They will continuously recommend on behalf of Irelands young person and actively advance the engagement of immature people in determination devising. The NYCI works in partnership with over 50 voluntary young person administrations as good province bureaus concerned wi th young person issues including the DoE A ; S, to advance immature people in an holistic manner, in order to measure the most efficient mode young person services may be delivered. NYCI affiliated member administrations are offered preparation and associated supports to help advance a committed and uniformed attack to run into many of the demands for the corporate good of immature people. To ease this attack the NYCI act as a agent, sometimes guaranting a democratic and inclusive class of action for all involved in young person work whether service supplier and user. The relationship between the NYCI and its member administrations is good to working towards developing best pattern criterions. Reacting to the demands of its members and the immature people they interact with, the NYCI facilitates developing programmes covering many facets of young person work, to include protagonism, immature individual centred preparation and dependence recovery reding. Such preparation is in maintaining with the ethos of advancing the best involvements ; good being and democratic rights of immature people, and may travel beyond the statutory demands of the Youth Work Act 2001. The administrations ain policies and processs are designed to put accent on the results of immature people through equity and an just attack. All member administrations are encouraged to follow the values and nucleus pattern of the NYCI for the interest of the safety and healthy development demands of all immature people. The administration is proactive in its attack towards kid protection and works with its members and others to measure and turn to the kid protection demands of the young person work sector. As a primary advocator for the young person sector the NYCI can associate to Statutory organic structures, the demands and sentiments of the sector refering the safeguarding of immature people through effectual national and local kid protection policies ( NYCI, 2009 ) . Due to policies that enable this administration to negociate with and rede Government on behalf of immature people, youth workers and young person administrations it is perchance at the coal face for recommending for kids s and immature peoples rights. In decision, both formal and non-formal bureaus have achieved much since the early 1990s refering kid protection, giving due consideration to the demands of kids and immature people. The province has introduced statute law and amended some older jurisprudence every bit good as naming an Ombudsman for Children. Government has been influential in publishing new guidelines and policy to advance kid public assistance. The private sector has represented its ego as lobbyist for the immature. Recommending on behalf Ireland s young person. The private sector played a function in determining the policies and guidelines now excepted as best pattern. However, much of the kid related statute law in Ireland is based on values from an age yesteryear. Children and immature people should non hold to get by with the conditions of the twenty-first century, whilst holding imposed upon them twentieth century thought and patterns ( Laszlo, 1997 ) . Irish society demands to be more far-seeing, more flexib le and wise plenty non to sabotage new thought and systems ( Sterling, 2001 ) that could run into the demands and advance the sustainable public assistance of its kids and immature people.

Billy Budds lessons in Farewell to the Rights of Man! Essays

Billy Budds lessons in Farewell to the Rights of Man! Essays Billy Budds lessons in Farewell to the Rights of Man! Essay Billy Budds lessons in Farewell to the Rights of Man! Essay Essay Topic: A Farewell to Arms The film presents itself with Billy Budd as a sailor on a ship called the, Rights of Man. A ship from the British Navy is chasing them down as they correctly suspect, to impress men aboard theyre ship to become part of the navy. As we see on the ship, Billy Budd is a very lively, happy character that made everyone happy by singing through his tiring work. Budd is forced upon the HS Avenger where the crew is an unhappy, grumpy lot. Their unhappiness is due mostly to the master at arms, John Claggart. However, Budds jubilant personality brought light and warmth to an otherwise gloomy and cold ship. Budd proceeds to innocently try and become friends with Claggart. Claggart does not trust humans and he thinks that all men are out to get each other. He believe that he had to punish them before they get to him. Budds attempts fail though, and Claggart still treats him horribly and with bitterness. Shortly after, Claggart catches wind of a plot to end his own life, he brings it to the captain and accuses Budd of being the leader in this conspiracy. It seems however, that Claggart is really threatened by Budds apparent talent at making friends and ability to attract people to follow him, causing him to think he could start a mutiny. Mutinys in the year 1797 were a major concern in the British Navy and punishments to any involved were always severe if not the end of their lives. The captain calls both Claggart and Budd to his cabin for questioning. Claggart commences in spewing lies and accusations about Budd. Before Claggart can finish this, Budd, in a fit of anger and loss of words, hits Claggart and kills him with a single blow. This causes a problem for the ships captain, Captain Vere, (meaning truth). He personally did not like Claggart and he understands that Budd had no intention, but he feels that the only just thing to do would be to hang Billy Budd. He assembles a court marshal and they consult about what to do. Vere cannot decide whether to follow his own personal feelings or whether to follow his duty. In the end, they decide that the just thing to do would be to hang Billy Budd. Surprisingly, Budd is very content and does not fight the decision, for he understands what he has done. When Budd goes to be hanged before the crew, they voice their unhappiness, but none step forward to fight for his life. Billy Budd dies in front of the crew peacefully and without last words. Portrayal of the Legal System: This film brings up issues pertaining to Capital Punishment. It seems like an unfavorable portrayal of it, since Budd is such a likeable character. The film makes Claggart seem like a criminal for all the suffering and horrible things he makes the crew got through. But one could argue that he is just fulfilling his duty. The film makes Budd look like a hero, because he makes everyone happy through trying times. The way the Captain handles it is a very realistic approach to the situation. Just like in hammurabis Code, the famous Eye for an Eye, stands true in this. The legal system is presented in a few ways. The master of arms, Claggart is almost like the police. He watches the crew and enforces the laws of the ship. If a law is broken by one of the crew, then he reports it to the Captain who then will decide a punishment for the man. A judge and jury could be compared to the questioning from the captain and then the court marshal where they decide what should be done with Budd. The punishments would be done aboard ship. The crew cannot defend themselves really; their word is not taken as heavily as that of the Master at Arms. Relationship between Legal System and the Individual/Society: The main relationship that was portrayed in this movie was that between Claggart and Billy. This was an obviously strained relationship. Billy was very open to a friendship with Claggart, but Claggart would not have it and deemed it to be impossible. Since Claggart is the legal system, and Billy is the individual this represents one relationship. Another relationship that is key is the relationship between Captain Verre and the code. Captain Verre would like to forgive Billy and to let him go and not press charges, but the code says that Billy should die. This poses a conflict between Verres moral and lawful values. Should he kill Budd as the law tells him to? Or should he let it pass, because he knows Billy is a good person and it was accidental? The Issue/Conflict: The issue/conflict arose when Billy boarded the ship. His jubilant manner contradicted how the master at arms felt sailors should be. He took this attitude as a threat to the order of the ship. He saw Billy as the type of person who would start a mutiny. Claggart felt that Billy was up to something, especially when he attempted being friends with him. It created division, because Claggart cannot trust anyone and thinks Billy Is bad news. It created division, because everything Billy does to make the crew happy, Claggart sees as it as an attempt to turn their backs on the rules and persuade them to do the wrong. The second, more important issue is that of Verre and his decision. It arose through the killing of Claggart and from deciding what Billys punishment should be. Side A says that it is the Captains duty to kill Billy according to the rules and the law. The captain also takes into account the life lost; that although Claggart was a gloomy person, he had the right to live and tha t right was taken away when Billy killed him. Side B would argue that Billy did it by accident and that it was not a malicious kill. Chances are, Billy would not kill again. There is also the chance that people will mutiny if Billy dies. These are the thoughts that run through the Captains mind when he ponders Billys future. The conflict ends with Bills execution through hanging. The Captain deduces that the right choice to make is to kill Billy according to the law, and Billy accepts that. Despite the crews disapproval of the action, the captain has to go through with it. Billy also is very content with the Captains decision, because he understands what he killed a man and that that is a capital punishment. Billy does not hold any bad feelings for feel bitter, because he feels bad about Claggarts death as well. The Message and the Subtext: (I was not clear whether you were referring to the time the book was made, or the time the movie was made) The book was started in 1886 by Herman Melville. During that time Capital Punishment might have been a controversy. This was probably a reflection upon the army and the issue of a persons rights. The army was much more strict in the 1800s than it is not and brutal punishment was not unheard of. However, I suspect that this is not related to the army and just that of how someone should be judged. I think Herman Melvilles intention was to show the conflict between duty and morals. In 1962 this movie was probably related more to the army. In 1967 the United States was in a cold was with Russia and many troops were being deployed through out the world to protect countries. Many men were being court marshaled and many people were being investigated for conspiracy, since it was a largely unpopular war to be in. It probably brought up the issue of killing the enemy. Technically for killing someone, you should die or be severely punished. Even if he/she is the enemy like Claggart, do they have the same rights that we have? This is the type of question that people in the army had to face and had to live through. The Movie, its Message, and You: To me, Billy Budd explored the idea that even though you are not a bad person, you can still be punished for a crime you committed according to the law. This film taught me that many courts are unforgiving and would never forgive a random outburst of anger. This both calms me, and frightens me. It calms me because that means that people, who kill and dont mean to or dont understand their strength and ways, are being put into jail far away from me. But it also frightens me, to think that what if it happened to me and no one is merciful? It also gets me thinking about capital punishment and where it should be applied. Such as, under what circumstances does a person have to kill for their life to be taken away? What type of mental state do they need to have? Does it matter? It arose issues such as this and I left class the last of filming thinking about all of this. I think that this is a semi-accurate portrayal of the legal system. Semi-accurate, because today we have a jury, we have many people who would have defended Billy and others to defend Claggart. Or maybe there would have been a person to defend Jenkins when Claggart ordered him to his post, which led to his death. The portrayal of someone enforcing the law and some sort of court is very accurate though. The court marshal acts as the judge and the jury. The captain calls both men in for questioning before Billy kills Claggart. This is all accurate to how thinks would be help today. Ultimately, they decided to obey the law and kill Billy. However, the issue of Capital Punishment was different throughout all ages. Back in the 1800s there might not have ever been an argument about it, and people rarely questioned the law. It was just a clear yes, he deserves to die or no, he did not commit the crime. Now, people have become more passionate and we understand that there are certain circumst antial and rightful killings. Such as, killing to defend one self. I dont think Billy would be let go completely free. Most likely, they would give him 25 to life now. I think the argument is universally a problem and it always will be. There will always be side A and B who will lock heads and argue whether this punishment is humane or just. Watching this movie in class, it was not terribly exciting, but looking back on all the movies Ive watching in school it was not the worst. I liked the character Billy a lot and how he was cheerful through everything. I thought that generally, the acting was good since bad acting is a pet peeve of mine. What I did not like was the fact that it was in black and white. I really love color to catch my eye and the fact that every color was some variation of a mixture of black and white really annoyed me. The only other thing I can think of was that in man cases, I could not understand what they were saying. Thank god, you deciphered it. Over all, Im sure that if I saw the movie in theaters in 1962 I would have thoughts I got my moneys worth. Billy Budd taught us more than the law though. During the time Billy was aboard this Miserable ship Avenger, he always kept a positive attitude and took the cup half full, approach to any situation. That teaches me that maybe school isnt that bad and maybe I should take things from a different angle instead of seeing all the work involved. I also learned to accept whats for me and what you cant help. Such as this paper, at first I was very reluctant to start a 13-paragraph essay. Thats pretty daunting, but as I rounded my 5th paragraph I knew that I had to do this. This is acceptance, not to the same greatness and peacefulness ad Billys, but still getting there. The third lesson I took from Billy Budd is not to kill someone., because there are always consequences for your actions. Not that I ever considered killing someone, but I mean that it made a big impression on me that in the real world, hey dont care is you have a problem getting the words out so you just punch. There are no s econd chances. So, with me on the road I realize that there is no saying whoops sorry, wont happen again. Theres saying, Please dont tell my parents I got arrested. Its kind of a slap in the face that bad things happen to good people, and good people do bad things to make that true.